If I were in charge, this transcriptionist would be fired:
If you can just
deliver what your brand [promises/promise is 4:56] and execute it really well, you’re already such a long way to establishing a
loyalty.
You can't figure out whether it's "promises" or "promise is"?! Only one of them makes sense. This isn't difficult. Do your job. Seriously.
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Commas save lives
When you're talking to someone, always put a comma between what you say and that person's name. This shows that you're talking to them rather than them being a part of the sentence. Observe:
You look like a cheap French harlot, Amy.
See how we have the comma to offset "Amy"? This is because we don't necessarily need her name in there for this sentence to make sentence. We could remove her name without changing the meaning of the sentence. It makes it less clear who looks like a cheap French harlot, but the meaning is still the same.
Here's another:
You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch.
Again, we could take out his name, and the sentence would not change in meaning. The comma is there to signal that we are talking to someone and that Mr. Grinch is not actually part of the sentence.
Here's why you need this:
Hugo: Is this your favorite luncheon meat?
Vorelli: It is Hugo.
Because there's no comma before "Hugo," we have to assume that he's part of the sentence, not that Vorelli is talking to Hugo. Instead of saying, "It is," and confirming that this is indeed his favorite luncheon meat, this indicates that Vorelli's favorite luncheon meat is Hugo. We can all see how this makes no sense. His favorite luncheon meat could be ham or bologna, but it's probably not Hugo.
Of course, there's also this classic example of the difference that can be made by one simple comma:
Let's eat, Grandpa!
Let's eat Grandpa!
You look like a cheap French harlot, Amy.
See how we have the comma to offset "Amy"? This is because we don't necessarily need her name in there for this sentence to make sentence. We could remove her name without changing the meaning of the sentence. It makes it less clear who looks like a cheap French harlot, but the meaning is still the same.
Here's another:
You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch.
Again, we could take out his name, and the sentence would not change in meaning. The comma is there to signal that we are talking to someone and that Mr. Grinch is not actually part of the sentence.
Here's why you need this:
Hugo: Is this your favorite luncheon meat?
Vorelli: It is Hugo.
Because there's no comma before "Hugo," we have to assume that he's part of the sentence, not that Vorelli is talking to Hugo. Instead of saying, "It is," and confirming that this is indeed his favorite luncheon meat, this indicates that Vorelli's favorite luncheon meat is Hugo. We can all see how this makes no sense. His favorite luncheon meat could be ham or bologna, but it's probably not Hugo.
Of course, there's also this classic example of the difference that can be made by one simple comma:
Let's eat, Grandpa!
Let's eat Grandpa!
Friday, September 23, 2011
Facebook win!
Remember how I posted that link yesterday about responses to stupid Facebook posts? This one should be on there.
Totally makes my day.
What the hell is punctuation day??? My planner says its tomorrow. Please someone tell me what it is lol
Totally makes my day.
Thursday, September 22, 2011
It makes science sense, I guess
This was all me and evidence of why transcriptionists should proof their work:
I was wearing myself out and acidiphying my body.
"Acidify" is definitely a word. I guess I thought I should make super sure everyone knew acidifying has to do with changing the pH.
I was wearing myself out and acidiphying my body.
"Acidify" is definitely a word. I guess I thought I should make super sure everyone knew acidifying has to do with changing the pH.
And many more
Okay, this goes on forever, and I know there's a whole Failbook thing, but my sister sent me this and some of them just crack me up. I wish I was just a bit crankier so I could respond to people's posts like this. If you're bored, take a look.
http://www.happyplace.com/3645/the-best-obnoxious-responses-to-misspellings-on-facebook
http://www.happyplace.com/3645/the-best-obnoxious-responses-to-misspellings-on-facebook
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
For the last time
PEOPLE ARE WHO, NOT THAT! YOU CANNOT SAY "THE PERSON THAT ___." THIS IS INCORRECT. STOP DOING IT!
Thank you.
Thank you.
Not a very good teaser
This is a
headline from the Weather Channel's website:
Madison
Ranks in Top 10 Worst Fall Allergy Cities
Okay, neat.
Now here's the little teaser underneath:
The Weather Channel teamed up with the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of
America to rank the country's fall allergy hot spots. Where does Madison rank?
To find out, read more.
Um, I'm going to go ahead and make the
assumption that Madison ranks in the top 10 of the worst fall allergy cities. I
think I read that somewhere.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)